Okay, I have to admit that I'm a little confused. I saw this article from the Associated Press under the headline:
City to Strike Ban on Being Willfully Annoying
GRAND RAPIDS, MI — It's soon expected to be OK to be willfully annoying in Grand Rapids.
The City Commission is nixing a 38-year-old section of city code that states "no person shall willfully annoy another person."
City Attorney Catherine Mish recommended repealing the language, saying the wording is "unconstitutional in terms of being vague" and "simply unenforceable." A final decision is expected March 11.
What I don't understand is that having this law on the books, why would they want to do away with it? To my way of thinking, and probably to most libertarians, this is the only law that SHOULD be on the books!
No comments:
Post a Comment